TLDR
- DOJ sold 57.55 BTC worth $6.3 million on November 3, 2025.
- Sale may violate Executive Order 14233 guidelines for asset management.
- Developers charged with operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), and Southern District of New York (SDNY) have reportedly sold Bitcoin that they seized from two Samourai Wallet developers. They sold approximately 57.55 BTC, which equates to about $6.3 million, on November 3, 2025. This sale via Coinbase Prime may violate Executive Order 14233, which requires the retention of such assets in the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR). This information comes from a detailed report on this event.
Both Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill, the developers in question, were involved in illegal financial activities through their operations of an unlicensed money transmitting business. They were charged under 18 U.S. Code § 1960 and § 982(a)(1), leading to their forfeiture of Bitcoin tied to transactions amounting to over $200 million in alleged illegal activities, including cybercrime and fraud.
Legal Implications for DOJ Actions
The sale contravenes the Executive Order 14233, which establishes guidelines for handling forfeited cryptocurrency. This directive clearly states that such assets must be retained within the government’s strategic reserves rather than sold to the public. The Executive Order was designed to ensure that Bitcoin seized by the government is strategically managed rather than entering public circulation.
Nicolas Roos, Acting U.S. Attorney at the time of the developers’ guilty plea, noted the service’s facilitation of money laundering activities. Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche had earlier issued a memo cautioning against targeting virtual currency centric platforms unnecessarily. The SDNY’s actions run contrary to this directive, marking a shift in handling such cases.
Understanding the Samourai Wallet Case
Samourai Wallet is a privacy-focused Bitcoin mixing service operated by the accused individuals, Rodriguez and Hill. They plead guilty to the operation of their service as an unlicensed money transmitting business. The total amount of 57.55 BTC forfeited fits under the “Government BTC” category as defined by the Executive Order.
The funds moved to Coinbase Prime, where a subsequent sale left the address at a zero balance, suggesting complete disposal of these assets on the market. This eludes the standards adhered to in retaining government-held Bitcoin, raising questions regarding compliance and internal decision-making processes.
Historical Context in Bitcoin Enforcement
This is not the first instance where SDNY has seemed to defy directives related to Bitcoin management. In the past, it pursued cases against Samourai and Tornado Cash, despite internal documents advising against this approach. The previous administration favored aggressive actions against privacy-oriented noncustodial tools, leading to similar outcomes.
No official comments or statements from primary sources such as Twitter or government portals are available. According to reports, former President Trump might consider offering a pardon to the developers, yet no primary source confirms this potential action.
Analyzing the Financial Impact
The sale’s completion with no allocated funding changes or impacts on Total Value Locked (TVL) in decentralized financial ecosystems indicates a strictly market-related event. The assets transferred from these government holdings into the broader market signify a shift in liquidity, yet lacking broader financial implications.
Direct on-chain data shows the completed transaction to Coinbase Prime, bypassing typical USMS custody and inserting additional questions regarding asset management that deviates from outlined procedures within executive guidelines.
Key Details from the Executive Order
The Executive Order 14233 details the establishment of the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) and mandates how BTC forfeited from criminals is to be handled. It aims to regulate the holding and strategic use of cryptocurrencies amassed through legal forfeitures. This approach contrasts with the sale of these assets, as reported in this case.
For a more comprehensive context on the executive order and related government plans for digital assets, see the official documentation.
| Disclaimer: The content on defiliban.com is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry inherent risks. Please consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. |
